Researchers claim that delay in administering second coronavirus vaccine shot could be dangerous

Researchers claim that delay in administering second coronavirus vaccine shot could be dangerous

Due to the increasing coronavirus cases, emergence of more transmissible variants, and slow vaccine rollout, some countries have decided to delay the rollout of the second coronavirus shot to make sure everyone gets at least a shot.

 

This has sparked debates among scientists, some of which fear that delaying the second coronavirus shot can lead to a more transmissible variant of the virus.

The UK and the US take different approaches to deliver the second vaccine shot

In the United Kingdom, where researchers have raised concerns about a new coronavirus variant that appears to be more contagious than other versions, officials are choosing to extend the time between each vaccine dose from three or four weeks to up to three months.

 

The United States, on the other hand, are sticking to the regimen recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration authorized in December—two shots spaced three weeks apart for Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine, and four weeks apart for Moderna’s.

Delaying the second shot might leave millions of people unprotected

Experts are concerned about the delay in administering the vaccine because it might lead to millions of people walking around with only partial immunity to the coronavirus, a condition that could be ripe for harmful mutations of the virus to arise.

 

“Delaying the second shot is a gamble,” says Ramón Lorenzo-Redondo, a virologist at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, “particularly without a lot of evidence suggesting how well one dose works. Officials shouldn’t gamble [their] best tools to fight the pandemic,”

 

“We don’t want to fuel [potential viral evolution] by doing suboptimal immunization of the population.” He says.

 

Sarah Cobey, an epidemiologist and evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago, is one of the scientists who aren’t worried about the risk of a long delay between shots.

 

“That’s because even the partial protection that people may get from a single dose will almost certainly lower the prevalence of infection,” she says.

Similar articles

Do You Really Own Your Land? Property Law Riddles In Everyday Life

Do You Really Own Your Land? Property Law Riddles In Everyday Life

Buying a home, fencing a garden, or signing a lease all feel like clear markers of “ownership”, yet property law keeps ambushing everyday life with fine print that can surprise even careful buyers and long-time residents. Across Australia, boundary errors, easements, strata by-laws, native title, and even a neighbour’s tree can change what you can build, block, or remove, and recent disputes show that land “rights” often depend on documents most people never read. The result is a modern riddle : how much of your land is truly yours? Ownership feels simple, until it isn’t “My name is on the title, so it’s mine.” That assumption is emotionally intuitive, and it is broadly correct in Australia’s Torrens title system, yet day-to-day property conflicts show how quickly certainty can fray....